Tuesday, September 12, 2017
Sunday, April 24, 2016
Friday, June 15, 2012
Google Voice: a step-by-step primer on ditching your land line while keeping your number | ZDNet
'via Blog this'
Wednesday, February 08, 2012
Histogram Myth explicated
Histogram Myth explicated:
Many photography instructors and experts in the field are innocently and incorrectly making inaccurate claims, such as those three below, about how to interpret a histogram as seen on your camera’s LCD. The representation that the “tonal x-axis value” is somehow logarithmic in scale, as suggested by bringing “stops” or “amount of light collected” into the discussion, is the cause of confusion. By the very definition of what the histogram is, we should know that it is just a linear scale. We can clearly see that this is the case just by watching the histogram shift on the camera LCD while stopping down. I’ve known otherwise good photographers to give up trying to understand things in this field because they can’t comprehend what’s being thrown at them when histograms are being discussed by the experts… all the experts couldn’t be wrong could they? Well, in this case, yes. Those of you previously driven to insanity can now come back to school.
Claim: “You’ll lose half your tonal values for each one full stop of under-exposure.” Wrong, losing half of your light by stopping down one stop, doesn’t mean you will lose half your tonal values.
Claim: “Fully half of the tonal values are in the brightest fifth of a histogram. So, if you don’t have at least some pixels heading out into that rightmost fifth of the histogram, you’re wasting half of the potential tonal information that your camera can capture!“
Claim: “If we array the stops of dynamic range along our monochromatic or luminance histogram, we’ll notice that each stop (from left to right) contains two times more information than the previous stop. And notice also that most of the possible color values are in the brightest areas. That is, our camera can capture only a relatively few dark tonal values and lots of bright tonal values.”
Illustration: An example of the myth being propagated.
Illustration is courtesy of, and many thanks to, Costa Rica photographer Greg Basco who was great in helping me to finally understand this issue as he tolerated my barrage of challenges with grace and patience.
I’ve seen this myth repeated over and over for years throughout the literature. This stop metaphor applied to the interpretation of histograms is misleading and inaccurate, and may teach photographers poor technique. The resultant implied prescription to not unnecessarily under-expose, because you’ll lose up to half your tonal values in just a one stop change, is quantitatively false, and may encourage photographers to overexpose their images in avoiding loss of tonal information that is in fact not as at-risk as implied.
By stopping down one stop, you are indeed capturing only one-half the number of photons, but you are not losing one-half of your measured and perceptible tonal values. There is no argument that we should almost never intentionally underexpose an image if we can keep all pixel values withing the histogram and not blown out to the right.
A histogram is, by definition, a plot of frequency-of-occurrence of perceived brightness or tonal values of pixels, and you can see for yourself, say using live view (in a camera that has say just 5-stops of dynamic range) that as you stop down your camera, for each stop, the histogram shifts smoothly and linearly to the left by one-fifth of the horizontal-axis tonal value range.
That’s by definition of what the histogram does – it plots the frequency of occurrence of tonal values or perceived brightness of the pixels in an image.<<< below paragraph added for clarity 12 Jan 2012>> The key to understanding is to first define what the histogram is supposed to represent, including the terms used in the definition. So.. if the definition of the histogram in this context is “the frequency of occurrence of tonal values plotted linearly“ then any claim that the horizontal-axis is not linear would immediately seem silly on the surface, as it indeed is. And you can really clearly see in Liveview that the histogram as implemented by camera manufacturers, just scoots along in a nice linear fashion, as the lens is stopped down. The histogram isn’t an abstract concept or metaphor, it’s a simple data visualization tool. Each pixel in an image has a tonal value as perceived by a human in say a grey scale chart test pattern with 256 gradations from left-to-right. The values range from say 1 or black at the left, to say 256 or white at the right. If the brightest pixels are 256, and the darkest are 1, then 128 represents the tonal value of the center pixels of the test pattern. There are by definition 256 tonal values. To state that fully half of these values are found in the upper 1/5th or 1/8th portion of the plot (depending on your dynamic range model) is silly. So once again, “losing half of your light by stopping down one stop, doesn’t mean you will lose half your tonal values.” <<< this paragraph added for clarity 12 Jan 2012>>
The dynamic range of the camera is totally accommodated and compensated for by this point in time in the internal systems production of a linear brightness scale (~luminosity) seen in the histogram.
The myth arises primarily because (1) people try to make photography more complicated than it is, and (2) it isn’t appreciated that human perceived brightness is a logarithmic function of the number of photons detected by a sensor. Doubling the number of photons hitting pixels (by changing aperture by one stop) does not double the brightness. Doubling the intensity (photon density) of a point of light does not double our perception of it’s brightness (this is a biological phenomenon), and similarly, by design, the conversion of voltages read out from a sensor chip takes this into consideration.
In the end, the histograms we see on the camera LCD and in Lightroom or Photoshop are just plots of the perceived brightness vs. frequency-of-occurrence of pixels.
Because photon-density vs. brightness is logarithmic and not linear in human perception, doubling the amount of light collected (or doubling the number of photons counted or equivalently the signal voltage created) does not double the perceived brightness (tonal level) quantized by the camera’s electronics and written into RAW or jpg values. By definition, our camera and Photoshop histograms display the distribution of pixels by perceived brightness.Laboratory assignment. Prove this yourself.
To show this empirically, I downloaded a 10-tonal-level grey scale chart from the internet, which has ten vertical intensity bands, then opened it in Photoshop, viewed Histogram, and selected regions over each pattern.
The histogram looks like a flat or evenly pulsed line, since the grey-levels are distributed evenly and the frequency of occurrence of pixels in each of these tonal value zones is equal in number to any other because of the design of the test pattern.
Photoshop quantizes the histogram view into 256 columns/containers for display purposes.
The RBG tonal values will be linearly different from sample pattern column to sample pattern column by about 28.4 on this projection to 256 plotting points (256/9), or 11% (100/9)
I measured (in 8-bits/channel RGB mode, these mean values)
0, 28, 56, 85, 113, 141, 170, 198, 226, 255
and converted to Grey-levels and measured in these percentages:
0, 15, 28, 41, 53, 64, 75, 84, 92, 100Another example using a 21-tonal level test pattern
yields the same, as similarly expected, these linear values…
0, 13, 26, 38, 51, 64, 77, 89, 102, 115, 128, 140, 153, 166, 178, 191, 204, 217, 229, 242, 255 (~13 difference per step or 256/20=12.8)So again, the top 1/5th values, in these cases,
[226, 255] and
[204, 217, 229, 242, 255]
range across 20% of the tonal range, not the 50% as claimed.QED
Wednesday, November 23, 2011
Thursday, May 19, 2011
Study Says Spam Can Be Cut by Blocking Card Transactions - NYTimes.com
Thursday, May 05, 2011
Michelle Obama Dances "The Dougie" and "Running Man"
Here Is An Awesome Video Of Michelle Obama Dancing - a delight to watch.
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/michelle-obama-dancing-dougie-running-man-2011-5#ixzz1LUw0LZQH
How nice to have a hip first lady!
Wednesday, March 02, 2011
A Day Made of Glass... Made possible by Corning.
This http://www.youtube.com/v/6Cf7IL_eZ38&rel=0&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&version=3 video by Corning Glass is very Apple-like and is the best representation of the "Apple future" I've seen.
Check out http://ted.com/ for the more such insights into our society's technical future.
Tuesday, March 01, 2011
Table of Contents « California Photo Scout
Thanks to William Bouton for making me aware of this site for "Exposing California’s photo secrets one location at a time" showing where and how to photo many locations in California... a terrific little blog
Thursday, February 17, 2011
Netflix: My Name is Khan
I vote this best movie I've seen this past year.. worth watching... a moving piece exploring race and religious conflicts and hatred versus love.
My Name is Khan - 2010 PG-13 161 minutes
Rizwan Khan (Shahrukh Khan), a Muslim man with Asperger syndrome, lives happily with his wife, Mandira (Kajol), in San Francisco until a tragedy drives her away after the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Now he is on a quest to recapture the heart of the woman he loves. Traveling across America, Rizwan faces prejudice because of his religion and unusual behavior, but he also inspires the people he meets with his unique outlook on life.
Available via Netflix DVD or streaming. Get the DVD and turn on sub-titles for best comprehension
Wednesday, February 02, 2011
Birds captured at 1/8000th of a second by amateur British wildlife photographer | Mail Online
Wildlife photographers will delight in seeing these images and reading the footnotes and comments regarding the equipment and techniques used.
Sunday, January 30, 2011
CODA Commitment and Ingenuity
My friend and past associate Don Christian is the lead commentator in this video about the CODA car which may revolutionize the lives of many in the near future.
Thursday, December 09, 2010
In The Era Of The Connected Camera, The Point & Shoot Commits Seppuku
Why haven't Point & Shoot or DSLR cameras incorporated GPS like my iPhone has?
My high-end Nikon P6000 Point & Shoot had GPS, but the replacement P7000 model dropped it - perhaps because it did not work very reliably.
None of the off-the-shelf Nikon or Canon SLRs incorporate GPS - what's wrong with these companies - don't they get it?
Monday, November 22, 2010
HOME, is one of the most important videos you will ever watch regarding the future of mankind.
man's impact on Earth is relatively recent in geologic time, yet the magnitude of our impact is stunning as seen from this perspective.
http://goodplanet.org/ Home Project http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Home_%282009_film%29
The narration and video quality matches any National Geographic title to date.
Home is a 2009 documentary by Yann Arthus-Bertrand. The film is almost entirely composed of aerial shots of various places on Earth. It shows the diversity of life on Earth and how humanity is threatening the ecological balance of the planet. The movie was released simultaneously on June 5, 2009 in cinemas across the globe, on DVD, Blu-ray, television, and on YouTube, opening in 181 countries.
The film was financed by PPR, a French multinational holding company specializing in retail shops and luxury brands, as part of their PR strategy.
Every thinking person will want to see this video, and tell the next person about it.
The documentary chronicles the present day state of the Earth, its climate and how we as the dominant species have long-term repercussions on its future. A theme expressed throughout the documentary is that of linkage—how all organisms and the Earth are linked in a "delicate but crucial" natural balance with each other, and how no organism can be self-sufficient.
To promote the documentary online, a YouTube channel known as "HomeProject" was created.
Copyright info.: Although the movie is formally under a Creative Commons license[citation needed], it has no official copyright. Yann Arthus-Bertrand emphasized in a TED talk [10] that the movie has no copyright: "This film have [sic] no copyright. On the fifth of June, the environmental day, everyone can download the movie on Internet. The film is given for free to the distributor for TV and theater to show it the five of June. There is no business on this movie. It is available for schools, cities, NGOs and you." This means the film can be distributed, copied, uploaded, burned to DVD, etc., without restrictions if not altered or edited. ClearBits, an online digital media community, provides a torrent of the 93-minute version in high-definition mp4 format.
The film received a large response upon release, receiving over 400,000 combined views within the first 24 hours on YouTube.[citation needed] As of April 2010, the French, English, German, Spanish, Russian and Arabic versions on Youtube logged a total of more than 14 million views. It was shown to high ratings on channels around the world including the international network National Geographic.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqxENMKaeCU
HOME (English with subtitles)
HOME, is one of the most important videos you will ever watch regarding the future of mankind.
man's impact on Earth is relatively recent in geologic time, yet the magnitude of our impact is stunning as seen from this perspective.
http://goodplanet.org/ Home Project http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Home_%282009_film%29
The narration and video quality matches any National Geographic title to date.
Home is a 2009 documentary by Yann Arthus-Bertrand. The film is almost entirely composed of aerial shots of various places on Earth. It shows the diversity of life on Earth and how humanity is threatening the ecological balance of the planet. The movie was released simultaneously on June 5, 2009 in cinemas across the globe, on DVD, Blu-ray, television, and on YouTube, opening in 181 countries.
The film was financed by PPR, a French multinational holding company specializing in retail shops and luxury brands, as part of their PR strategy.
Every thinking person will want to see this video, and tell the next person about it.
The documentary chronicles the present day state of the Earth, its climate and how we as the dominant species have long-term repercussions on its future. A theme expressed throughout the documentary is that of linkage—how all organisms and the Earth are linked in a "delicate but crucial" natural balance with each other, and how no organism can be self-sufficient.
To promote the documentary online, a YouTube channel known as "HomeProject" was created.
Copyright info.: Although the movie is formally under a Creative Commons license[citation needed], it has no official copyright. Yann Arthus-Bertrand emphasized in a TED talk [10] that the movie has no copyright: "This film have [sic] no copyright. On the fifth of June, the environmental day, everyone can download the movie on Internet. The film is given for free to the distributor for TV and theater to show it the five of June. There is no business on this movie. It is available for schools, cities, NGOs and you." This means the film can be distributed, copied, uploaded, burned to DVD, etc., without restrictions if not altered or edited. ClearBits, an online digital media community, provides a torrent of the 93-minute version in high-definition mp4 format.
The film received a large response upon release, receiving over 400,000 combined views within the first 24 hours on YouTube.[citation needed] As of April 2010, the French, English, German, Spanish, Russian and Arabic versions on Youtube logged a total of more than 14 million views. It was shown to high ratings on channels around the world including the international network National Geographic.
Tuesday, November 09, 2010
L-R Mike Baird and Mom Mrs. J.L. "Billie" Wilma Grace Baird in her condo in Saint Mary's Highland Hills in Bogart, GA, 09 Nov. 2010.
L-R Mike Baird and Mom Mrs. J.L. "Billie" Wilma Grace Baird in her condo in Saint Mary's Highland Hills in Bogart, GA, 09 Nov. 2010.
"Mike" Michael L. Baird, mike [at} mikebaird d o t comiPhone (805) 704-2064 (primary #, text, voicemail); alt home (805) 772-2044
Some of my photos I found on Wikimedia http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Photographs_by_Mike_Baird
Monday, November 08, 2010
Microstock Agencies – An Overview for Beginners | Yuri Arcurs
Photographers interested in creating income through "stock sales" need to follow the words of the undisputed master, Yuri Arcurs.
MICROSTOCK AGENCIES – AN OVERVIEW FOR BEGINNERS and more.
Thursday, November 04, 2010
New Times SLO | Publishing Local News and Entertainment for over 20 years in San Luis Obispo County
Read this very cool article in the New times about Matt Hudgens and his new standup paddle (SUP) board business in Morro Bay, CA. http://www.newtimesslo.com/strokes-and-plugs/5213/the-zen-of-paddling/ Everyone I know who's now into SUP knows Matt. The following articles were printed from New Times [newtimesslo ... New Times SLO I, thinking it was October and that we were going to Morro Bay, donned a full-body wetsuit. ... We paddled south in the bay, passing seals and sea lions, ...
Tuesday, October 19, 2010
8 of 9 Peregrine Falcon Juvenile Fledgling, Morro Bay, CA 27 May 2008
8 of 9 Peregrine Falcon Juvenile Fledgling, Morro Bay, CA 27 May 2008
Originally uploaded by mikebaird
